Pricelists.org Pricelists.org Přihlásit se Registrovat se

CEMAF as a Census Method

☆☆☆☆☆ (0 reviews)
Show price history
CEMAF as a Census Method
Lowest price (incl. delivery)
53,99 USD
Typical price44,83 PLN
Lowest (90 days)34,99 PLN
Offers4
Last updatedpřed 1 týdnem
See best offer
Price history (90 days)
Full history
2026-08-08 2026-08-15
Historie cen
AktualizovánoCena
2026-08-0834,99
2026-08-1434,99
2026-08-1553,45
Prodejce Product price Delivery Celkem Dostupnost Updated
SP SpringerNatureLink Shop INT 34,99 USD 19,00 USD 53,99 USD Dostupné před 1 dnem View offer
SP SpringerNatureLink Shop INT 34,99 USD 19,00 USD 53,99 USD Dostupné před 1 dnem View offer
SP SpringerNatureLink Shop INT 53,45 EUR 19,00 EUR 72,45 EUR Dostupné před 1 dnem View offer
SP Springer Nature Author 53,45 EUR 15,00 EUR 68,45 EUR Dostupné před 1 týdnem View offer

Ceny a dostupnost se mohou změnit. Naposledy aktualizováno: 08.08.2026 10:13.

0,0
☆☆☆☆☆
0 reviews
5★ 0%
4★ 0%
3★ 0%
2★ 0%
1★ 0%

Product reviews

Rating
No reviews yet — be the first!
In  provocative terms that  push the envelope of technical, administrative, and legal capabilities, Swanson and Walashek  propose a re-vamped US census  based neither on the current system, self-enumeration, nor its predecessor, door-to-door canvassing.  Instead, they propose that it be built on a combination of four elements: (1) administrative records; (2) the continuously updated Master Address File; (3) survey data; and (4) modeling and imputation techniques.  They use “Census-Enhanced Master Address File (CEMAF) as a descriptive term for their proposal, which is based on four principles and includes a proposal for an independent Census Bureau.   They argue that evidence suggests that the methods used to conduct traditional census counts may be at the end of their useful working lives, as evidenced by increasing costs and declining response rates. Some of their ideas will seem farfetched. However, Swanson and Walashek believe this is the time to discuss radical proposals as governments re-examine the utility of traditional census counts and consider reductions, as is the case in Canada and England.   This SpringerBriefs should be on the reading list of staff in statistical agencies grappling with rising costs and declining response rates, as well as census stakeholders concerned about costs, accuracy, and census utility.

Similar products